[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a372c25-7ce1-e931-8d7e-a2e14b82c8f0@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:51:12 +0800
From: "Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@...el.com>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"kernel test robot" <yujie.liu@...el.com>
CC: Seth Jenkins <sethjenkins@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
<kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kasan: map shadow for percpu pages on demand
Hi Andrey,
On 10/28/2022 5:31 AM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> KASAN maps shadow for the entire CPU-entry-area:
> [CPU_ENTRY_AREA_BASE, CPU_ENTRY_AREA_BASE + CPU_ENTRY_AREA_MAP_SIZE]
>
> This explodes after commit 1248fb6a8201 ("x86/mm: Randomize per-cpu entry area")
> since it increases CPU_ENTRY_AREA_MAP_SIZE to 512 GB and KASAN fails
> to allocate shadow for such big area.
>
> Fix this by allocating KASAN shadow only for really used cpu entry area
> addresses mapped by cea_map_percpu_pages()
>
> Fixes: 1248fb6a8201 ("x86/mm: Randomize per-cpu entry area")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@...el.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202210241508.2e203c3d-yujie.liu@intel.com
> Tested-by: Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kasan.h | 3 +++
> arch/x86/mm/cpu_entry_area.c | 8 +++++++-
> arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kasan.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kasan.h
> index 13e70da38bed..de75306b932e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kasan.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kasan.h
> @@ -28,9 +28,12 @@
> #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
> void __init kasan_early_init(void);
> void __init kasan_init(void);
> +void __init kasan_populate_shadow_for_vaddr(void *va, size_t size, int nid);
> #else
> static inline void kasan_early_init(void) { }
> static inline void kasan_init(void) { }
> +static inline void kasan_populate_shadow_for_vaddr(void *va, size_t size,
> + int nid) { }
> #endif
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/cpu_entry_area.c b/arch/x86/mm/cpu_entry_area.c
> index ad1f750517a1..ac2e952186c3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/cpu_entry_area.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/cpu_entry_area.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <asm/cpu_entry_area.h>
> #include <asm/fixmap.h>
> #include <asm/desc.h>
> +#include <asm/kasan.h>
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU_PAGE_ALIGNED(struct entry_stack_page, entry_stack_storage);
>
> @@ -91,8 +92,13 @@ void cea_set_pte(void *cea_vaddr, phys_addr_t pa, pgprot_t flags)
> static void __init
> cea_map_percpu_pages(void *cea_vaddr, void *ptr, int pages, pgprot_t prot)
> {
> + phys_addr_t pa = per_cpu_ptr_to_phys(ptr);
> +
> + kasan_populate_shadow_for_vaddr(cea_vaddr, pages * PAGE_SIZE,
> + early_pfn_to_nid(PFN_DOWN(pa)));
> +
> for ( ; pages; pages--, cea_vaddr+= PAGE_SIZE, ptr += PAGE_SIZE)
> - cea_set_pte(cea_vaddr, per_cpu_ptr_to_phys(ptr), prot);
> + cea_set_pte(cea_vaddr, pa, prot);
> }
>
> static void __init percpu_setup_debug_store(unsigned int cpu)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c
> index e7b9b464a82f..d1416926ad52 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c
> @@ -316,6 +316,18 @@ void __init kasan_early_init(void)
> kasan_map_early_shadow(init_top_pgt);
> }
>
> +void __init kasan_populate_shadow_for_vaddr(void *va, size_t size, int nid)
> +{
> + unsigned long shadow_start, shadow_end;
> +
> + shadow_start = (unsigned long)kasan_mem_to_shadow(va);
> + shadow_start = round_down(shadow_start, PAGE_SIZE);
> + shadow_end = (unsigned long)kasan_mem_to_shadow(va + size);
> + shadow_end = round_up(shadow_end, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> + kasan_populate_shadow(shadow_start, shadow_end, nid);
> +}
> +
> void __init kasan_init(void)
> {
> int i;
> @@ -393,9 +405,6 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
> kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)VMALLOC_END + 1),
> shadow_cpu_entry_begin);
>
> - kasan_populate_shadow((unsigned long)shadow_cpu_entry_begin,
> - (unsigned long)shadow_cpu_entry_end, 0);
> -
There will be address in the range (shadow_cpu_entry_begin, shadow_cpu_entry_end)
which has no KASAN shadow mapping populated after the patch. Not sure whether
it could be a problem. Thanks.
Regards
Yin, Fengwei
> kasan_populate_early_shadow(shadow_cpu_entry_end,
> kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)__START_KERNEL_map));
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists