linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: findbit: document ARMv5 bit offset calculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y1wxqPccRE+biAfw@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 28 Oct 2022 20:46:48 +0100
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: findbit: document ARMv5 bit offset calculation

On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 12:01:00PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Hmm. Interestingly, your _find_first_zero_bit_le() (which
> find_next_bit ends up using except for the first byte) ends up doing
> an optimization that is technically not valid.
> 
> In particular, the *generic* code does
> 
>                         sz = min(idx * BITS_PER_LONG + __ffs(MUNGE(val)), sz);
> 
> for the final result.
> 
> In contrast, the arm code doesn't do the "min()" at all, and if there
> are bits after the bitmap (in a partial byte), it will just return
> those bits.

You've missed how the min() is coded. Specifically, that's handled by:

  cc:   e1510000        cmp     r1, r0
  d0:   31a00001        movcc   r0, r1

which clamps the returned index to the size of the array (held in r1).
So everything is in fact fine - and I think your analysis is incorrect.

Please could you take another look and evaluate whether you think the
arm assembly is incorrect.

I kind'a stopped reading here on the assumption that the remainder of
your email was based on this misinterpretation of the code.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!