linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: fix to f2fs_handle_critical

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9b7357f3-5e5e-c1db-fdf8-613b6ad7bac3@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Oct 2022 11:38:46 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: fix to f2fs_handle_critical_error when
 errors=remount-ro

On 2022/10/28 11:17, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 10/28, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2022/10/28 10:33, Yangtao Li wrote:
>>>> It won't pollute global namespace since it's a static function just be used in f2fs/super.c...
>>>
>>> emm, I think it would be nice to see the f2fs_record_error_work symbol
>>> in the stack, it can be explicitly a function of f2fs. personal opinion for reference only.
>>
>> Oh, yes, let me update in original patch as well.
> 
> Chao,
> 
> It seems there're multiple bugs. Please apply this as well.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20221027180416.3786792-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org/T/#u

Jaegeuk,

Thanks, let me merge all those patches and do the test.

Thanks,

> 
>>
>>>
>>>> Do you mind letting me merge these two patches into original patch?
>>>> since original patch is still in dev branch, rather than mainline.
>>>
>>> Glad to see, if resend.
>>
>> Thanks, :)
>>
>>>
>>>> I guess it needs to stop ckpt thread as well...
>>>
>>> agree, :)
>>>
>>> Thanks,