[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34c4037b-d152-412d-e551-dd3ea27b6b46@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 18:07:16 -0400
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Maarten Zanders <maarten.zanders@...d.be>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
Cc: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: leds-lp55xx: add ti,disable-charge-pump
On 28/10/2022 09:34, Maarten Zanders wrote:
> Add a binding to disable the internal charge pump for lp55xx.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Zanders <maarten.zanders@...d.be>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp55xx.yaml | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp55xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp55xx.yaml
> index 7ec676e53851..9eb8d1017402 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp55xx.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp55xx.yaml
> @@ -64,6 +64,11 @@ properties:
> '#size-cells':
> const: 0
>
> + ti,disable-charge-pump:
> + description: |
Drop |
> + Disable the internal charge pump.
Does it mean that it is enabled by default?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists