linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 19/31] timers: net: Use del_timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221028183149.2882a29b@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Fri, 28 Oct 2022 18:31:49 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Mirko Lindner <mlindner@...vell.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        coreteam@...filter.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
        tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 19/31] timers: net: Use del_timer_shutdown()
 before freeing timer


Could someone from networking confirm (or deny) that the timer being
removed in sk_stop_timer() will no longer be used even if del_timer()
returns false?

net/core/sock.c:

void sk_stop_timer(struct sock *sk, struct timer_list* timer)
{
	if (del_timer(timer))
		__sock_put(sk);
}

If this is the case, then I'll add the following interface:

   del_timer_sync_shutdown() // the common case which syncs

   del_timer_shutdown() // the uncommon case, that returns immediately
                        // used for those cases that add extra code to
                        // handle it, like sk_stop_timer()


Which has the same semantics as del_timer_sync() and del_timer()
respectively, but will prevent the timer from being rearmed again.

This way we can convert the sk_stop_timer() to:

void sk_stop_timer(struct sock *sk, struct timer_list* timer)
{
	if (del_timer_shutdown(timer))
		__sock_put(sk);
}


We can also add the del_timer_shutdown() to other locations that need to
put a timer into a shutdown state before freeing, and where it's in a
context that can not call del_timer_sync_shutdown().

-- Steve