[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c97e9273-60b6-2ca7-1993-05bfbf471f3f@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 16:27:10 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Cc: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
seanjc@...gle.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
elena.reshetova@...el.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/tdx: Extract GET_INFO call from get_cc_mask()
I looked at this a bit more closely. The code is just bonkers now. It
can't go in like this.
tdx_parse_tdinfo() stashes two global variables. Then, about three
lines later in the function, it calls get_cc_mask() which just returns
one of those variables, modulo a little masking.
Ditto for the td_attr. It's stashed in a global variable and then read
one time.
There is *ZERO* reason to store 'td_attr'. There's also zero reason to
have 'gpa_width' as a global variable. It's only used *ONE* *TIME* from
the scope of *ONE* *FUNCTION*.
Even the comment is bonkers:
/*
* Initializes gpa_width and td_attr. Must be called before
* get_cc_mask() or attribute checks.
*/
tdx_parse_tdinfo();
Comments are great. But comments that are only there because the code
is obtuse are not. I changed it to:
tdx_parse_tdinfo(&cc_mask);
It doesn't even need a comment now. Why? Because it's obvious from the
naming and calling convention that it initializes cc_mask and what the
ordering dependency is. Plus, even *if* I missed the call, or screwed
up the order, the compiler would tell me that I'm a dolt.
The whole global variable thing actually makes the code objectively
worse in almost every possible way.
Can you please take a look through this and make sure I didn't botch
anything:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/daveh/devel.git/log/?h=tdxbadve
The end result is about 50 lines less than what was there before. Most
of it is comment removal but the code is simpler too.
Acks and Tested-by's would be appreciated.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists