[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1tRu3SFMrS3su56@debian.me>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:51:23 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Slark Xiao <slark_xiao@....com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Add vendor ID for Quectel and Cinterion
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:37:11AM +0800, Slark Xiao wrote:
> In MHI driver, there are some companies product still do not have their
> own PCI vendor macro. So we add it here to make the code neat. Ref ID
> could be found in link https://pcisig.com/membership/member-companies
> and https://pciids.sourceforge.net/pci.ids . Thales use Cinterion as
> their IOT modem card's trademark. So you will find 0x1269 belongs to
> Thales. Actually, Cinterion belongs to Gemalto, and Gemalto belongs to
> Thales.
>
The patch description is confusing me.
What about below instead?
```
Add missing vendor ID for Cinterion (which is 0x1269).
```
> Signed-off-by: Slark Xiao <slark_xiao@....com>
> ---
> include/linux/pci_ids.h | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> index b362d90eb9b0..9e2b6286f53f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> @@ -1765,6 +1765,8 @@
> #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_SATSAGEM 0x1267
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_SATSAGEM_NICCY 0x1016
>
> +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_CINTERION 0x1269 /* Celluar Modules*/
> +
> #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_ENSONIQ 0x1274
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ENSONIQ_CT5880 0x5880
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ENSONIQ_ES1370 0x5000
> @@ -2585,6 +2587,8 @@
> #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_TEKRAM 0x1de1
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_TEKRAM_DC290 0xdc29
>
> +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_QUECTEL 0x1eac
> +
Why pourring in Quectel ID while this patch is about Cinterion?
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists