| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20221028063826.GC3885130@chaop.bj.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:38:26 +0800
From: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
To: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
luto@...nel.org, jun.nakajima@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, david@...hat.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
ddutile@...hat.com, dhildenb@...hat.com,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>, tabba@...gle.com,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, mhocko@...e.com,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>, wei.w.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/8] KVM: Update lpage info when private/shared memory
are mixed
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 01:46:20PM -0700, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 11:13:42PM +0800,
> Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > When private/shared memory are mixed in a large page, the lpage_info may
> > not be accurate and should be updated with this mixed info. A large page
> > has mixed pages can't be really mapped as large page since its
> > private/shared pages are from different physical memory.
> >
> > Update lpage_info when private/shared memory attribute is changed. If
> > both private and shared pages are within a large page region, it can't
> > be mapped as large page. It's a bit challenge to track the mixed
> > info in a 'count' like variable, this patch instead reserves a bit in
> > 'disallow_lpage' to indicate a large page has mixed private/share pages.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 +++
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +
> > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 19 ++++++
> > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 16 +++--
> > 5 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> ...
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > index 33b1aec44fb8..67a9823a8c35 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> ...
> > @@ -6910,3 +6915,108 @@ void kvm_mmu_pre_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> > if (kvm->arch.nx_lpage_recovery_thread)
> > kthread_stop(kvm->arch.nx_lpage_recovery_thread);
> > }
> > +
> > +static inline bool linfo_is_mixed(struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo)
> > +{
> > + return linfo->disallow_lpage & KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void linfo_update_mixed(struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo, bool mixed)
> > +{
> > + if (mixed)
> > + linfo->disallow_lpage |= KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> > + else
> > + linfo->disallow_lpage &= ~KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool mem_attr_is_mixed_2m(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int attr,
> > + gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > +{
> > + XA_STATE(xas, &kvm->mem_attr_array, start);
> > + gfn_t gfn = start;
> > + void *entry;
> > + bool shared = attr == KVM_MEM_ATTR_SHARED;
> > + bool mixed = false;
> > +
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + entry = xas_load(&xas);
> > + while (gfn < end) {
> > + if (xas_retry(&xas, entry))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + KVM_BUG_ON(gfn != xas.xa_index, kvm);
> > +
> > + if ((entry && !shared) || (!entry && shared)) {
> > + mixed = true;
> > + goto out;
>
> nitpick: goto isn't needed. break should work.
Thanks.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + entry = xas_next(&xas);
> > + gfn++;
> > + }
> > +out:
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > + return mixed;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool mem_attr_is_mixed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > + int level, unsigned int attr,
> > + gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long gfn;
> > + void *entry;
> > +
> > + if (level == PG_LEVEL_2M)
> > + return mem_attr_is_mixed_2m(kvm, attr, start, end);
> > +
> > + entry = xa_load(&kvm->mem_attr_array, start);
> > + for (gfn = start; gfn < end; gfn += KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level - 1)) {
> > + if (linfo_is_mixed(lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level - 1)))
> > + return true;
> > + if (xa_load(&kvm->mem_attr_array, gfn) != entry)
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void kvm_arch_update_mem_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > + unsigned int attr, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > +{
> > +
> > + unsigned long lpage_start, lpage_end;
> > + unsigned long gfn, pages, mask;
> > + int level;
> > +
> > + WARN_ONCE(!(attr & (KVM_MEM_ATTR_PRIVATE | KVM_MEM_ATTR_SHARED)),
> > + "Unsupported mem attribute.\n");
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The sequence matters here: we update the higher level basing on the
> > + * lower level's scanning result.
> > + */
> > + for (level = PG_LEVEL_2M; level <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; level++) {
> > + pages = KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level);
> > + mask = ~(pages - 1);
>
> nitpick: KVM_HPAGE_MASK(level). Maybe matter of preference.
Yes, haven't noticed there is a KVM_HPAGE_MASK defined. Have no
strong preference here, since I already have KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level),
getting mask is straightforward.
A single KVM_HPAGE_MASK(level) will not give me what I need since here
is gfn, KVM_HPAGE_MASK(level)>> PAGE_SHIFT should be the right
equivalent.
Chao
>
>
> > + lpage_start = max(start & mask, slot->base_gfn);
> > + lpage_end = (end - 1) & mask;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * We only need to scan the head and tail page, for middle pages
> > + * we know they are not mixed.
> > + */
> > + linfo_update_mixed(lpage_info_slot(lpage_start, slot, level),
> > + mem_attr_is_mixed(kvm, slot, level, attr,
> > + lpage_start, start));
> > +
> > + if (lpage_start == lpage_end)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + for (gfn = lpage_start + pages; gfn < lpage_end; gfn += pages)
> > + linfo_update_mixed(lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level),
> > + false);
> > +
> > + linfo_update_mixed(lpage_info_slot(lpage_end, slot, level),
> > + mem_attr_is_mixed(kvm, slot, level, attr,
> > + end, lpage_end + pages));
> > + }
> > +}
>
> --
> Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists