| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20221028073637.31195-9-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 09:36:36 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, parth@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: qais.yousef@....com, chris.hyser@...cle.com,
patrick.bellasi@...bug.net, David.Laight@...lab.com,
pjt@...gle.com, pavel@....cz, tj@...nel.org, qperret@...gle.com,
tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, joshdon@...gle.com, timj@....org,
kprateek.nayak@....com, yu.c.chen@...el.com,
youssefesmat@...omium.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 8/9] sched/fair: Add latency list
Add a rb tree for latency sensitive entities so we can schedule the most
sensitive one first even when it failed to preempt current at wakeup or
when it got quickly preempted by another entity of higher priority.
In order to keep fairness, the latency is used once at wakeup to get a
minimum slice and not during the following scheduling slice to prevent
long running entity to got more running time than allocated to his nice
priority.
The rb tree enables to cover the last corner case where latency
sensitive entity can't got schedule quickly after the wakeup.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 2 +
kernel/sched/fair.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index a74cad08e91e..0b92674e3664 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -547,6 +547,8 @@ struct sched_entity {
/* For load-balancing: */
struct load_weight load;
struct rb_node run_node;
+ struct rb_node latency_node;
+ unsigned int on_latency;
struct list_head group_node;
unsigned int on_rq;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a7372f80b1ea..c28992b7d1a6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -664,7 +664,77 @@ struct sched_entity *__pick_last_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
return __node_2_se(last);
}
+#endif
+/**************************************************************
+ * Scheduling class tree data structure manipulation methods:
+ * for latency
+ */
+
+static inline bool latency_before(struct sched_entity *a,
+ struct sched_entity *b)
+{
+ return (s64)(a->vruntime + a->latency_offset - b->vruntime - b->latency_offset) < 0;
+}
+
+#define __latency_node_2_se(node) \
+ rb_entry((node), struct sched_entity, latency_node)
+
+static inline bool __latency_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b)
+{
+ return latency_before(__latency_node_2_se(a), __latency_node_2_se(b));
+}
+
+/*
+ * Enqueue an entity into the latency rb-tree:
+ */
+static void __enqueue_latency(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
+{
+
+ /* Only latency sensitive entity can be added to the list */
+ if (se->latency_offset >= 0)
+ return;
+
+ if (se->on_latency)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * An execution time less than sysctl_sched_min_granularity means that
+ * the entity has been preempted by a higher sched class or an entity
+ * with higher latency constraint.
+ * Put it back in the list so it gets a chance to run 1st during the
+ * next slice.
+ */
+ if (!(flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP)) {
+ u64 delta_exec = se->sum_exec_runtime - se->prev_sum_exec_runtime;
+
+ if (delta_exec >= sysctl_sched_min_granularity)
+ return;
+ }
+
+ rb_add_cached(&se->latency_node, &cfs_rq->latency_timeline, __latency_less);
+ se->on_latency = 1;
+}
+
+static void __dequeue_latency(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
+{
+ if (se->on_latency) {
+ rb_erase_cached(&se->latency_node, &cfs_rq->latency_timeline);
+ se->on_latency = 0;
+ }
+}
+
+static struct sched_entity *__pick_first_latency(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+ struct rb_node *left = rb_first_cached(&cfs_rq->latency_timeline);
+
+ if (!left)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return __latency_node_2_se(left);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
/**************************************************************
* Scheduling class statistics methods:
*/
@@ -4439,8 +4509,10 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
check_schedstat_required();
update_stats_enqueue_fair(cfs_rq, se, flags);
check_spread(cfs_rq, se);
- if (!curr)
+ if (!curr) {
__enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
+ __enqueue_latency(cfs_rq, se, flags);
+ }
se->on_rq = 1;
if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1) {
@@ -4526,8 +4598,10 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se);
- if (se != cfs_rq->curr)
+ if (se != cfs_rq->curr) {
__dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
+ __dequeue_latency(cfs_rq, se);
+ }
se->on_rq = 0;
account_entity_dequeue(cfs_rq, se);
@@ -4616,6 +4690,7 @@ set_next_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
*/
update_stats_wait_end_fair(cfs_rq, se);
__dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
+ __dequeue_latency(cfs_rq, se);
update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG);
}
@@ -4654,7 +4729,7 @@ static struct sched_entity *
pick_next_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
{
struct sched_entity *left = __pick_first_entity(cfs_rq);
- struct sched_entity *se;
+ struct sched_entity *latency, *se;
/*
* If curr is set we have to see if its left of the leftmost entity
@@ -4696,6 +4771,12 @@ pick_next_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
se = cfs_rq->last;
}
+ /* Check for latency sensitive entity waiting for running */
+ latency = __pick_first_latency(cfs_rq);
+ if (latency && (latency != se) &&
+ wakeup_preempt_entity(latency, se) < 1)
+ se = latency;
+
return se;
}
@@ -4719,6 +4800,7 @@ static void put_prev_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *prev)
update_stats_wait_start_fair(cfs_rq, prev);
/* Put 'current' back into the tree. */
__enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, prev);
+ __enqueue_latency(cfs_rq, prev, 0);
/* in !on_rq case, update occurred at dequeue */
update_load_avg(cfs_rq, prev, 0);
}
@@ -11712,6 +11794,7 @@ static void set_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
cfs_rq->tasks_timeline = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
+ cfs_rq->latency_timeline = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->min_vruntime, (u64)(-(1LL << 20)));
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
raw_spin_lock_init(&cfs_rq->removed.lock);
@@ -12020,8 +12103,15 @@ int sched_group_set_latency(struct task_group *tg, s64 latency)
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
struct sched_entity *se = tg->se[i];
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i);
+ struct rq_flags rf;
+
+ rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf);
+ __dequeue_latency(se->cfs_rq, se);
WRITE_ONCE(se->latency_offset, latency);
+
+ rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
}
mutex_unlock(&shares_mutex);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index b22113c8939b..c8206945868d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -599,6 +599,7 @@ struct cfs_rq {
#endif
struct rb_root_cached tasks_timeline;
+ struct rb_root_cached latency_timeline;
/*
* 'curr' points to currently running entity on this cfs_rq.
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists