[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e60fab5-8a76-9b7e-08cf-fb791e01ae08@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 09:01:28 +0100
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
<jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <hare@...e.de>,
<bvanassche@....org>, <hch@....de>, <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
<niklas.cassel@....com>
CC: <axboe@...nel.dk>, <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>,
<linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <john.garry2@...l.dcu.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 2/7] ata: libata-scsi: Add
ata_internal_queuecommand()
On 27/10/2022 23:25, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> So we have this overall flow:
>>
>> ata_exec_internal_sg():
>> -> alloc request
>> -> blk_execute_rq_nowait()
>> ... -> scsi_queue_rq()
>> -> sht->reserved_queuecommd()
>> -> ata_internal_queuecommand()
>>
>> And then we have ata_internal_queuecommand() -> ata_sas_queuecmd() ->
>> ata_scsi_queue_internal() -> ata_qc_issue().
>>
>> Hope it makes sense.
> OK. Got it.
> However, ata_exec_internal_sg() being used only from EH context with the
> queue quiesced, will blk_execute_rq_nowait() work ? Is there an exception
> for internal reserved tags ?
>
Well, yeah. So if some error happens and EH kicks in, then full queue
depth of requests may be allocated. I have seen this for NCQ error. So
this is why I make in very first patch change allow us to allocate
reserved request from sdev request queue even when budget is fully
allocated.
Please also note that for AHCI, I make reserved depth =1, while for SAS
controllers it is greater. This means that in theory we could alloc > 1x
reserved command for SATA disk, but I don't think it matters.
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists