[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a92ffa8db8228b5cb41939dc37d6ee677aef0619.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:22:47 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Yakovlev <stas.yakovlev@...il.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] cfg80211: Avoid clashing function prototypes
Hm.
If you're splitting out per driver,
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c
> @@ -9870,7 +9870,7 @@ static int ipw_wx_sw_reset(struct net_device *dev,
>
> /* Rebase the WE IOCTLs to zero for the handler array */
> static iw_handler ipw_wx_handlers[] = {
> - IW_HANDLER(SIOCGIWNAME, (iw_handler)cfg80211_wext_giwname),
> + IW_HANDLER(SIOCGIWNAME, cfg80211_wext_giwname),
I can see how this (and similar) still belongs into this patch since
it's related to the cfg80211 change, but
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/orinoco/wext.c
> @@ -154,9 +154,10 @@ static struct iw_statistics *orinoco_get_wireless_stats(struct net_device *dev)
>
> static int orinoco_ioctl_setwap(struct net_device *dev,
> struct iw_request_info *info,
> - struct sockaddr *ap_addr,
> + union iwreq_data *wrqu,
> char *extra)
> {
> + struct sockaddr *ap_addr = &wrqu->ap_addr;
why this (and similar) too?
The same changes in hostap, zd1201 and airo you did split out?
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists