linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y1uxn8/y6AjCu4UU@debian>
Date:   Fri, 28 Oct 2022 11:40:31 +0100
From:   "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review

Hi Greg,

On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 06:54:58PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.76 release.
> There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Oct 2022 16:50:35 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20221016):
mips: 62 configs -> no failure
arm: 99 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> 1 failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Note:
1) arm64 allmodconfig fails with the error:

In file included from drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:10:
drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:282:25: error: 'tegra194_cpufreq_of_match' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'tegra194_cpufreq_data'?
  282 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra194_cpufreq_of_match);
      |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/module.h:244:15: note: in definition of macro 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE'
  244 | extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table               \
      |               ^~~~
./include/linux/module.h:244:21: error: conflicting types for '__mod_of__tegra194_cpufreq_of_match_device_table'; have 'const struct of_device_id[2]'
  244 | extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table               \
      |                     ^~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:417:1: note: in expansion of macro 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE'
  417 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra194_cpufreq_of_match);
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/module.h:244:21: note: previous declaration of '__mod_of__tegra194_cpufreq_of_match_device_table' with type 'int'
  244 | extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table               \
      |                     ^~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:282:1: note: in expansion of macro 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE'
  282 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra194_cpufreq_of_match);
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Same error as v5.10.y, should be for b281adc68db8 ("cpufreq: tegra194: Fix module loading").


2) Already reported by others:
/bin/sh: 1: ./scripts/pahole-flags.sh: Permission denied


Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2051
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2054

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>

-- 
Regards
Sudip