[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be3d4533-5f4e-d93e-dfec-1eaa1c7c4c8b@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 22:09:51 -0400
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp-ufs: rename current
bindings
On 24/10/2022 05:00, Johan Hovold wrote:
> The current QMP UFS PHY bindings are based on the original MSM8996 PCIe
> PHY binding which provided multiple PHYs per IP block and these in turn
> were described by child nodes.
>
> The QMP UFS PHY block only provide a single PHY and the remnant child
> node does not really reflect the hardware.
>
> The original MSM8996 binding also ended up describing the individual
> register blocks as belonging to either the wrapper node or the PHY child
> nodes.
>
> This is an unnecessary level of detail which has lead to problems when
> later IP blocks using different register layouts have been forced to fit
> the original mould rather than updating the binding. The bindings are
> arguable also incomplete as they only the describe register blocks used
> by the current Linux drivers.
>
> In preparation for adding new bindings for SC8280XP which further
> bindings can be based on, rename the current bindings after MSM8996 and
> add a reference to the SC8280XP bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists