[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <664bd195bdde7fd740572c4981c60b32de1465aa.camel@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 09:02:35 -0400
From: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>
To: Anastasia Belova <abelova@...ralinux.ru>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>,
Andrew-CT Chen <andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com>,
Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@...iatek.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vcodec: mediatek: add check for NULL for
vsi->frm_bufs[vsi->new_fb_idx].buf.fb in vp9_swap_frm_bufs
Hi,
Le vendredi 28 octobre 2022 à 15:58 +0300, Anastasia Belova a écrit :
> If vsi->frm_bufs[vsi->new_fb_idx].buf.fb == NULL while cleaning
> fb_free_list NULL-pointer is dereferenced.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Fixes: f77e89854b3e ("[media] vcodec: mediatek: Add Mediatek VP9 Video Decoder Driver")
>
> Signed-off-by: Anastasia Belova <abelova@...ralinux.ru>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec/vdec_vp9_if.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec/vdec_vp9_if.c b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec/vdec_vp9_if.c
> index 70b8383f7c8e..b0679aaf6192 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec/vdec_vp9_if.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec/vdec_vp9_if.c
> @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static void vp9_swap_frm_bufs(struct vdec_vp9_inst *inst)
> * clean fb_free_list
> */
> if (vsi->frm_bufs[vsi->new_fb_idx].ref_cnt == 0) {
> - if (!vp9_is_sf_ref_fb(
> + if (vsi->frm_bufs[vsi->new_fb_idx].buf.fb != NULL && !vp9_is_sf_ref_fb(
> inst, vsi->frm_bufs[vsi->new_fb_idx].buf.fb)) {
> struct vdec_fb *fb;
Perhaps we could try and maintain some readability ? I'd suggest to move the
check into vp9_is_sf_ref_fb() as an early return.
Nicolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists