[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y10hzXgvq+djdQEH@debian.me>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 19:51:25 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@...rlc.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: delete rebundant word in comments
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 06:04:31AM -0400, Shaomin Deng wrote:
> Delete the repeated word "that" in comments.
>
Meh...
On what comment?
Also, on patch subject, s/rebundant/redundant/.
> Signed-off-by: Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@...rlc.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 27a3f29c0181..2ad2fec6ed3f 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -7053,7 +7053,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int highest_zoneidx)
Ah! You mean balance_pgdat().
>
> /*
> * There should be no need to raise the scanning priority if
> - * enough pages are already being scanned that that high
> + * enough pages are already being scanned that high
> * watermark would be met at 100% efficiency.
> */
> if (kswapd_shrink_node(pgdat, &sc))
Dunno if the comment above is right.
I have already say to fellow @cdjrlc.com people that you and your team
**IGNORE** patch reviews. If you don't reply to this review, I would like
to just say NAK.
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists