[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1yFejAhNogYVpIW@google.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 18:44:26 -0700
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: ehci-pci: Set PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 09:13:14PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> However, I'm curious to know why this patch makes ehci-pci use
> PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS even when CONFIG_PM isn't set, whereas the 2/2
> patch makes xhci-pci use PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS only when CONFIG_PM
> is set.
That's definitely a bug in patch 2. This has nothing (or, little; probe
order can technically affect the PM suspend/resume order) to do with
CONFIG_PM, except that the .pm hooks tend to sit nearby, and repeated
driver patching makes the author's eyes glaze over sometimes...
Thanks. v2 coming.
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists