[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221029141633.295650-10-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 19:46:27 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: martin.petersen@...cle.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
andersson@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Cc: konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
quic_cang@...cinc.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/15] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Remove un-necessary WARN_ON()
In the reset assert and deassert callbacks, the supplied "id" is not used
at all and only the hba reset is performed all the time. So there is no
reason to use a WARN_ON on the "id".
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
---
drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
index 7cd996ac180b..8bb0f4415f1a 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -895,8 +895,6 @@ ufs_qcom_reset_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, unsigned long id)
{
struct ufs_qcom_host *host = rcdev_to_ufs_host(rcdev);
- /* Currently this code only knows about a single reset. */
- WARN_ON(id);
ufs_qcom_assert_reset(host->hba);
/* provide 1ms delay to let the reset pulse propagate. */
usleep_range(1000, 1100);
@@ -908,8 +906,6 @@ ufs_qcom_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, unsigned long id)
{
struct ufs_qcom_host *host = rcdev_to_ufs_host(rcdev);
- /* Currently this code only knows about a single reset. */
- WARN_ON(id);
ufs_qcom_deassert_reset(host->hba);
/*
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists