[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fc09a68c-bd6d-0328-4052-88d40b50077d@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 19:38:25 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@....com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, etienne.carriere@...aro.org,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, souvik.chakravarty@....com,
wleavitt@...vell.com, peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com,
nicola.mazzucato@....com, tarek.el-sherbiny@....com,
quic_kshivnan@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/11] Introduce a unified API for SCMI Server testing
Hi Christian,
On 10/19/2022 1:46 PM, Cristian Marussi wrote:
[snip]
> In V2 the runtime enable/disable switching capability has been removed
> (for now) since still not deemed to be stable/reliable enough: as a
> consequence when SCMI Raw support is compiled in, the regular SCMI stack
> drivers are now inhibited permanently for that Kernel.
For our platforms (ARCH_BRCMSTB) we would need to have the ability to
start with the regular SCMI stack to satisfy if nothing else, all clock
consumers otherwise it makes it fairly challenging for us to boot to a
prompt as we purposely turn off all unnecessary peripherals to conserve
power. We could introduce a "full on" mode to remove the clock provider
dependency, but I suspect others on "real" silicon may suffer from the
same short comings.
Once user-space is reached, I suppose we could find a way to unbind from
all SCMI consumers, and/or ensure that runtime PM is disabled, cpufreq
is in a governor that won't do any active frequency switching etc.
What do you think?
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists