linux-kernel - Re: [for-next PATCH v5 03/11] RDMA: Extend RDMA kernel verbs ABI to support flush

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <63c3eec8-bef3-f9c4-a552-0c075cd51b46@fujitsu.com>
Date:   Sat, 29 Oct 2022 11:15:15 +0800
From:   Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC:     Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@...il.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>,
        <yangx.jy@...itsu.com>, <y-goto@...itsu.com>, <mbloch@...dia.com>,
        <liangwenpeng@...wei.com>, <tom@...pey.com>,
        <tomasz.gromadzki@...el.com>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [for-next PATCH v5 03/11] RDMA: Extend RDMA kernel verbs ABI to
 support flush



On 29/10/2022 01:44, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 01:53:29PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
>> @@ -4321,6 +4330,8 @@ int ib_dealloc_xrcd_user(struct ib_xrcd *xrcd, struct ib_udata *udata);
>>   static inline int ib_check_mr_access(struct ib_device *ib_dev,
>>   				     unsigned int flags)
>>   {
>> +	u64 device_cap = ib_dev->attrs.device_cap_flags;
>> +
>>   	/*
>>   	 * Local write permission is required if remote write or
>>   	 * remote atomic permission is also requested.
>> @@ -4335,6 +4346,13 @@ static inline int ib_check_mr_access(struct ib_device *ib_dev,
>>   	if (flags & IB_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND &&
>>   	    !(ib_dev->attrs.kernel_cap_flags & IBK_ON_DEMAND_PAGING))
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	if ((flags & IB_ACCESS_FLUSH_GLOBAL &&
>> +	    !(device_cap & IB_DEVICE_FLUSH_GLOBAL)) ||
>> +	    (flags & IB_ACCESS_FLUSH_PERSISTENT &&
>> +	    !(device_cap & IB_DEVICE_FLUSH_PERSISTENT)))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
> This should be -EOPNOTSUPP as the above is changed to in for-next
Yes,  my local tree(V6) had updated this. will repost this later.



>
> Jason