| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 23:22:43 -0700
From: isaku.yamahata@...el.com
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: isaku.yamahata@...el.com, isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, erdemaktas@...gle.com,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 042/108] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Init role member of struct kvm_mmu_page at allocation
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Refactor tdp_mmu_alloc_sp() and tdp_mmu_init_sp and eliminate
tdp_mmu_init_child_sp(). Currently tdp_mmu_init_sp() (or
tdp_mmu_init_child_sp()) sets kvm_mmu_page.role after tdp_mmu_alloc_sp()
allocating struct kvm_mmu_page and its page table page. This patch makes
tdp_mmu_alloc_sp() initialize kvm_mmu_page.role instead of
tdp_mmu_init_sp().
To handle private page tables, argument of is_private needs to be passed
down. Given that already page level is passed down, it would be cumbersome
to add one more parameter about sp. Instead replace the level argument with
union kvm_mmu_page_role. Thus the number of argument won't be increased
and more info about sp can be passed down.
For private sp, secure page table will be also allocated in addition to
struct kvm_mmu_page and page table (spt member). The allocation functions
(tdp_mmu_alloc_sp() and __tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split()) need to know if the
allocation is for the conventional page table or private page table. Pass
union kvm_mmu_role to those functions and initialize role member of struct
kvm_mmu_page.
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h | 12 ++++++++++
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++---------------------
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
index f0af385c56e0..9e56a5b1024c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
@@ -115,4 +115,16 @@ void tdp_iter_start(struct tdp_iter *iter, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
void tdp_iter_next(struct tdp_iter *iter);
void tdp_iter_restart(struct tdp_iter *iter);
+static inline union kvm_mmu_page_role tdp_iter_child_role(struct tdp_iter *iter)
+{
+ union kvm_mmu_page_role child_role;
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *parent_sp;
+
+ parent_sp = sptep_to_sp(rcu_dereference(iter->sptep));
+
+ child_role = parent_sp->role;
+ child_role.level--;
+ return child_role;
+}
+
#endif /* __KVM_X86_MMU_TDP_ITER_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 11b0ec8aebe2..c6be76f9849c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -271,22 +271,28 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm,
kvm_mmu_page_as_id(_root) != _as_id) { \
} else
-static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ union kvm_mmu_page_role role)
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
sp = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache);
sp->spt = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache);
+ sp->role = role;
return sp;
}
static void tdp_mmu_init_sp(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, tdp_ptep_t sptep,
- gfn_t gfn, union kvm_mmu_page_role role)
+ gfn_t gfn)
{
set_page_private(virt_to_page(sp->spt), (unsigned long)sp);
- sp->role = role;
+ /*
+ * role must be set before calling this function. At least role.level
+ * is not 0 (PG_LEVEL_NONE).
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!sp->role.word);
sp->gfn = gfn;
sp->ptep = sptep;
sp->tdp_mmu_page = true;
@@ -294,20 +300,6 @@ static void tdp_mmu_init_sp(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, tdp_ptep_t sptep,
trace_kvm_mmu_get_page(sp, true);
}
-static void tdp_mmu_init_child_sp(struct kvm_mmu_page *child_sp,
- struct tdp_iter *iter)
-{
- struct kvm_mmu_page *parent_sp;
- union kvm_mmu_page_role role;
-
- parent_sp = sptep_to_sp(rcu_dereference(iter->sptep));
-
- role = parent_sp->role;
- role.level--;
-
- tdp_mmu_init_sp(child_sp, iter->sptep, iter->gfn, role);
-}
-
hpa_t kvm_tdp_mmu_get_vcpu_root_hpa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
union kvm_mmu_page_role role = vcpu->arch.mmu->root_role;
@@ -326,8 +318,8 @@ hpa_t kvm_tdp_mmu_get_vcpu_root_hpa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
goto out;
}
- root = tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(vcpu);
- tdp_mmu_init_sp(root, NULL, 0, role);
+ root = tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(vcpu, role);
+ tdp_mmu_init_sp(root, NULL, 0);
refcount_set(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count, 1);
@@ -1166,8 +1158,8 @@ static int tdp_mmu_populate_nonleaf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct tdp_iter *iter
KVM_BUG_ON(is_shadow_present_pte(iter->old_spte), vcpu->kvm);
KVM_BUG_ON(is_removed_spte(iter->old_spte), vcpu->kvm);
- sp = tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(vcpu);
- tdp_mmu_init_child_sp(sp, iter);
+ sp = tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(vcpu, tdp_iter_child_role(iter));
+ tdp_mmu_init_sp(sp, iter->sptep, iter->gfn);
ret = tdp_mmu_link_sp(vcpu->kvm, iter, sp, account_nx, true);
if (ret)
@@ -1435,7 +1427,7 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_wrprot_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
return spte_set;
}
-static struct kvm_mmu_page *__tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(gfp_t gfp)
+static struct kvm_mmu_page *__tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(gfp_t gfp, union kvm_mmu_page_role role)
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
@@ -1445,6 +1437,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *__tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(gfp_t gfp)
if (!sp)
return NULL;
+ sp->role = role;
sp->spt = (void *)__get_free_page(gfp);
if (!sp->spt) {
kmem_cache_free(mmu_page_header_cache, sp);
@@ -1458,6 +1451,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(struct kvm *kvm,
struct tdp_iter *iter,
bool shared)
{
+ union kvm_mmu_page_role role = tdp_iter_child_role(iter);
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
/*
@@ -1469,7 +1463,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(struct kvm *kvm,
* If this allocation fails we drop the lock and retry with reclaim
* allowed.
*/
- sp = __tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
+ sp = __tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_ACCOUNT, role);
if (sp)
return sp;
@@ -1481,7 +1475,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(struct kvm *kvm,
write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
iter->yielded = true;
- sp = __tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+ sp = __tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT, role);
if (shared)
read_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
@@ -1500,7 +1494,7 @@ static int tdp_mmu_split_huge_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
const int level = iter->level;
int ret, i;
- tdp_mmu_init_child_sp(sp, iter);
+ tdp_mmu_init_sp(sp, iter->sptep, iter->gfn);
/*
* No need for atomics when writing to sp->spt since the page table has
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists