[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8ccaabc1-2834-dad6-7d46-19bfc2adcc9a@acm.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 20:00:58 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Dawei Li <set_pte_at@...look.com>, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: hch@....de, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: simplify blksize_bits() implementation
On 10/29/22 19:17, Dawei Li wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index 57ed49f20d2e..7b537afe8b38 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -1349,12 +1349,7 @@ static inline int blk_rq_aligned(struct request_queue *q, unsigned long addr,
> /* assumes size > 256 */
> static inline unsigned int blksize_bits(unsigned int size)
> {
> - unsigned int bits = 8;
> - do {
> - bits++;
> - size >>= 1;
> - } while (size > 256);
> - return bits;
> + return order_base_2((size + SECTOR_SIZE - 1) >> SECTOR_SHIFT) + SECTOR_SHIFT;
> }
Why the rounding ("+ SECTOR_SIZE - 1")? The blksize_bits() argument
should be an argument of two.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists