[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221030154412.8320-2-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 18:44:11 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, noralf@...nnes.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] dma-buf: Make locking consistent in dma_buf_detach()
The dma_buf_detach() locks attach->dmabuf->resv and then unlocks
dmabuf->resv, which could be a two different locks from a static
code checker perspective. In particular this triggers Smatch to
report the "double unlock" error. Make the locking pointers consistent.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/Y1fLfsccW3AS%2Fo+%2F@kili/
Fixes: 809d9c72c2f8 ("dma-buf: Move dma_buf_attach() to dynamic locking specification")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
---
drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index c40d72d318fd..13bfd2d09c56 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -995,10 +995,10 @@ static void __unmap_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
*/
void dma_buf_detach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
{
- if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !attach))
+ if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !attach || dmabuf != attach->dmabuf))
return;
- dma_resv_lock(attach->dmabuf->resv, NULL);
+ dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
if (attach->sgt) {
--
2.37.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists