linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] fpga: dfl: add basic support DFHv1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y171ZEHpOydtR4dW@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:06:28 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
Cc:     matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com, hao.wu@...el.com,
        russell.h.weight@...el.com, basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@...el.com,
        trix@...hat.com, mdf@...nel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tianfei.zhang@...el.com, corbet@....net, jirislaby@...nel.org,
        geert+renesas@...der.be, niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se,
        macro@...am.me.uk, johan@...nel.org, lukas@...ner.de,
        ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, marpagan@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] fpga: dfl: add basic support DFHv1

On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 09:08:44PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> On 2022-10-20 at 14:26:09 -0700, matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com wrote:

> >  struct dfl_feature_info {
> >  	u16 fid;
> >  	u8 revision;
> > +	u8 dfh_version;
> >  	struct resource mmio_res;
> >  	void __iomem *ioaddr;
> >  	struct list_head node;
> >  	unsigned int irq_base;
> >  	unsigned int nr_irqs;
> > +	unsigned int param_size;
> > +	u64 params[];
> >  };

...

> > +	finfo = kzalloc(sizeof(*finfo) + dfh_psize, GFP_KERNEL);


This probably may use something from overflow.h.

> The u64 flexible array in the structure, but seems dfh_get_psize could
> not garantee 64bit aligned size.
> 
> What's the mandatory alignment of param data? If 64bit aligned, bit 33-34
> of PARAM_HDR should be reserved. If 32bit aligned, finfo:params should be
> u32[].

Isn't it guaranteed by the C standard / architecture ABI?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko