lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y179MD6Jupj9n4NA@spud>
Date:   Sun, 30 Oct 2022 22:39:44 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc:     Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
        Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@...onical.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
        Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] riscv: dts: renesas: Add initial devicetree for
 Renesas RZ/Five SoC

On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 10:27:17PM +0000, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi Conor,

> > > You could just move the below part to the second dtsi patch. Then
> > > compile won't be broken.
> > >
> > >             clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD R9A07G043_NCEPLIC_ACLK>;
> > >             power-domains = <&cpg>;
> > >             resets = <&cpg R9A07G043_NCEPLIC_ARESETN>;
> >
> > The makefile for this directory is not added until the next patch right?
> > The compile shouldn't be broken here since it therefore cannot be
> > compiled?
> >
> These nodes are already present in the kernel [0]  so the makefile
> change in the next patch if made here still won't break the
> compilation alone of SoC DTSI (included in dts).

Yeah I know, I did actually build the dtb ;)
I was just confused as to how Guo Ren had found a build issue with this
patch that the follow on patch would fix, when this dtsi is not
buildable in this patch.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ