| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 11:36:45 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@...il.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] memblock tests: add top-down NUMA tests for
memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw
On 19.10.22 20:34, Rebecca Mckeever wrote:
> Add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() where the simulated physical
> memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes. Additionally, all of these
> tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. These tests are run with a top-down
> allocation direction.
>
> The tested scenarios are:
>
> Range unrestricted:
> - region can be allocated in the specific node requested:
> + there are no previously reserved regions
> + the requested node is partially reserved but has enough space
>
> Range restricted:
> - region can be allocated in the specific node requested after dropping
> min_addr:
> + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
> first node is the requested node
> + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
> requested node ends before min_addr
> + range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and
> the requested node ends before min_addr
>
> Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@...il.com>
> ---
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists