linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/8] ASoC: rt5682: Support dbvdd and ldo1-in supplies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 31 Oct 2022 14:41:25 +0100
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Nícolas F. R. A. Prado 
        <nfraprado@...labora.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@...ltek.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] ASoC: rt5682: Support dbvdd and ldo1-in supplies

Il 31/10/22 14:09, Mark Brown ha scritto:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 04:55:38PM -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> 
>> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ const char *rt5682_supply_names[RT5682_NUM_SUPPLIES] = {
>>   	"AVDD",
>>   	"MICVDD",
>>   	"VBAT",
>> +	"dbvdd",
>> +	"ldo1-in",
> 
> Why are we making these inconsistent in style with the other supplies?

Right. That would be the same for rt5682s, and for the entire series. :\

Cheers,
angelo