linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] hwmon: (scmi) Register explicitly with Thermal Framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221031140021.GB948107@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Mon, 31 Oct 2022 07:00:21 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] hwmon: (scmi) Register explicitly with Thermal
 Framework

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 01:25:23PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 11:40:18AM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > Available sensors are enumerated and reported by the SCMI platform server
> > using a 16bit identification number; not all such sensors are of a type
> > supported by hwmon subsystem and, among the supported ones, only a subset
> > could be temperature sensors that have to be registered with the Thermal
> > Framework.
> > Potential clashes between hwmon channels indexes and the underlying real
> > sensors IDs do not play well with the hwmon<-->thermal bridge automatic
> > registration routines and could need a sensible number of fake dummy
> > sensors to be made up in order to keep indexes and IDs in sync.
> > 
> > Avoid to use the hwmon<-->thermal bridge dropping the HWMON_C_REGISTER_TZ
> > attribute and instead explicit register temperature sensors directly with
> > the Thermal Framework.
> >
> 
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> FWIW from scmi perspective,
> 
> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> 
> I was about to ask for your ack to pickup myself but I see there is no
> strict dependency for that. Not sure if you want to take this as fix for
> v6.1 as the thermal changes broke the existing support in SCMI hwmon
> or do you still prefer v6.2 ?
> 

It is a regression and should be applied to 6.1. I'll pick it up and send
a pull request to Linus later this week.

Thanks,
Guenter