[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y19GhTg8Q/3ym/VD@google.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 12:52:37 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: apparmor: global buffers spin lock may get contended
On (22/10/28 02:34), John Johansen wrote:
> From d026988196fdbda7234fb87bc3e4aea22edcbaf9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 01:18:41 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] apparmor: cache buffers on percpu list if there is lock
> contention
>
> On a heavily loaded machine there can be lock contention on the
> global buffers lock. Add a percpu list to cache buffers on when
> lock contention is encountered.
>
> When allocating buffers attempt to use cached buffers first,
> before taking the global buffers lock. When freeing buffers
> try to put them back to the global list but if contention is
> encountered, put the buffer on the percpu list.
>
> The length of time a buffer is held on the percpu list is dynamically
> adjusted based on lock contention. The amount of hold time is rapidly
> increased and slow ramped down.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists