lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1/tnic0qc/Ll/5u@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 31 Oct 2022 15:45:34 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>,
        Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: regulator: Add regulator-output bindingg

On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 12:44:50PM -0700, Zev Weiss wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 08:51:54AM PDT, Mark Brown wrote:

> > We don't turn things off on reboot?  We don't do anything in particular
> > on reboot...

> Okay, perhaps not on reboot specifically, but the userspace-consumer driver
> has a regulator_bulk_disable() in its .remove function, so it would be
> triggered at least by a module unload (which is sort of why I ended up with
> the "when software relinquishes control" wording in the patch).  If we're
> going to continue with the plan of using that driver for this functionality
> (which seems overall quite reasonable to me), we need a way to express that
> that must not happen on this hardware.

Ah, that would be the test driver not intended to be used in production
then...  That shouldn't be a blocker for the DT binding, and if there's
a different compatible string for this application then we can either
make the userspace consumer do something different based on that
compatible string or have a new driver which does something more
sensible and perhaps has a better userspace ABI.  Either way so long as
we can tell the thing being described is a BMC output from the DT
binding I think we can leave it up to the OS to do something constructive
with that rather than trying to control the specific behaviour in the
binding.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ