[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d20431d9-93fc-e810-5734-ed49925bca33@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 08:39:06 +0800
From: chenlifu <chenlifu@...wei.com>
To: <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] genirq: Separate warning messages of enable of
suspended irq
在 2022/9/20 14:42, chenlifu 写道:
> 在 2022/7/28 18:29, Chen Lifu 写道:
>> Both unbalanced enable for irq and enable of suspended irq
>> print same warning messages, such as:
>> ......
>> [20220314100142]------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [20220314100142]WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 10332 at kernel/irq/manage.c:723
>> __enable_irq+0x58/0xa4
>> [20220314100142]Unbalanced enable for IRQ 38
>> ......
>>
>> It's confusing. Separate the warning messages to make it clear.
>> No functional changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Lifu <chenlifu@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/irq/manage.c | 8 +++++---
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
>> index 40fe7806cc8c..bf4f5f63b2d3 100644
>> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
>> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
>> @@ -775,17 +775,19 @@ void disable_nmi_nosync(unsigned int irq)
>> void __enable_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
>> {
>> switch (desc->depth) {
>> case 0:
>> - err_out:
>> WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "Unbalanced enable for IRQ %d\n",
>> irq_desc_get_irq(desc));
>> break;
>> case 1: {
>> - if (desc->istate & IRQS_SUSPENDED)
>> - goto err_out;
>> + if (desc->istate & IRQS_SUSPENDED) {
>> + WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "Enable of suspended IRQ %d\n",
>> + irq_desc_get_irq(desc));
>> + break;
>> + }
>> /* Prevent probing on this irq: */
>> irq_settings_set_noprobe(desc);
>> /*
>> * Call irq_startup() not irq_enable() here because the
>> * interrupt might be marked NOAUTOEN. So irq_startup()
>>
>
> Friendly ping ...
>
> .
Friendly ping ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists