[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5d04a6c-79b4-bbdc-b613-6958d9f75d53@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 12:07:45 +0800
From: Guorui Yu <GuoRui.Yu@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com
Cc: ak@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
dave.hansen@...el.com, david@...hat.com, elena.reshetova@...el.com,
hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luto@...nel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
thomas.lendacky@....com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tdx: Do not allow #VE due to EPT violation on the
private memory
The core of this vulnerability is not directly related to the
ATTR_SEPT_VE_DISABLE, but the MMIO processing logic in #VE.
We have encountered similar problems on SEV-ES, here are their fixes on
Kernel [1] and OVMF[2].
Instead of enforcing the ATTR_SEPT_VE_DISABLE in TDX guest kernel, I
think the fix should also include necessary check on the MMIO path of
the #VE routine.
static int handle_mmio(struct pt_regs *regs, struct ve_info *ve)
{
unsigned long *reg, val, vaddr;
char buffer[MAX_INSN_SIZE];
struct insn insn = {};
enum mmio_type mmio;
int size, extend_size;
u8 extend_val = 0;
// Some addtional security check about ve->gpa should be introduced here.
/* Only in-kernel MMIO is supported */
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(user_mode(regs)))
return -EFAULT;
// ...
}
If we don't fix the problem at the point where we found, but rely on
complicated composite logic and long comments in the kernel, I'm
confident we'll fall back into the same pit in the near future :).
[1]
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/1a2dcbdde82e3a5f1db9b2f4c48aa1aeba534fb2/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c#L503
[2] OVMF:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/db2c22633f3c761975d8f469a0e195d8b79e1287/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitVcHandler.c#L670
Powered by blists - more mailing lists