linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] workqueue: destroy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y2AXwPEqqaVi45g/@slm.duckdns.org>
Date:   Mon, 31 Oct 2022 08:45:20 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] workqueue: destroy_worker() vs isolated CPUs

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:42:46AM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 04/10/22 16:05, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I haven't sent an update for this in a while, but the issue has risen again in
> > some other environment so I'm getting more reasons to push this out.
> 
> Gentle ping.

The approach looks fine to me. I only have minor comments. I'll reply to
each patch.

Lai, you've been involved in this effort in earlier patch series, how does
this look to you now?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun