[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221031190938.GA3264845-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 14:09:38 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
<nfraprado@...labora.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@...ltek.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] ASoC: rt5682: Support dbvdd and ldo1-in supplies
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 12:31:40PM -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 01:09:28PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 04:55:38PM -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> >
> > > @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ const char *rt5682_supply_names[RT5682_NUM_SUPPLIES] = {
> > > "AVDD",
> > > "MICVDD",
> > > "VBAT",
> > > + "dbvdd",
> > > + "ldo1-in",
> >
> > Why are we making these inconsistent in style with the other supplies?
>
> In short because the other supplies already have users while these are new ones.
> My understanding was that new supplies should have lowercase names, following DT
> convention. But I do see the argument on having them all be consistent for a
> single driver/binding. If there are no remarks from Rob or Krzysztof I can
> change it in the next version.
We want lowercase and consistency... Between the 2, I pick consistency.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists