[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202211011456.6B73479@keescook>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 14:57:18 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
Cc: shaggy@...nel.org, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+5fc38b2ddbbca7f5c680@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jfs: Fix fortify moan in symlink
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 01:48:05PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Kees Cook (keescook@...omium.org) wrote:
> > This looks like a GCC bug (going at least back to GCC 10.2)[1], but some
> > extra care around the macro appears to make it go away, so the reporting
> > variable doesn't get confused/re-evaluated:
>
> Thanks for chasing that; are you also going to file a gcc bug?
No, I haven't had the time to minimize a PoC, so I'm not sure it would
make a very good bug report.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists