[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221101221255.gwaem6w7upv545fw@pali>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 23:12:55 +0100
From: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc/boot: Don't always pass -mcpu=powerpc when
building 32-bit uImage
On Sunday 09 October 2022 13:06:52 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 29 August 2022 10:54:51 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 28 August 2022 17:43:53 Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > > Le 28/08/2022 à 19:41, Pali Rohár a écrit :
> > > > On Sunday 28 August 2022 17:39:25 Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > > >> Le 28/08/2022 à 19:33, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Le 28/08/2022 à 11:56, Pali Rohár a écrit :
> > > >>>> When CONFIG_TARGET_CPU is specified then pass its value to the compiler
> > > >>>> -mcpu option. This fixes following build error when building kernel with
> > > >>>> powerpc e500 SPE capable cross compilers:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> BOOTAS arch/powerpc/boot/crt0.o
> > > >>>> powerpc-linux-gnuspe-gcc: error: unrecognized argument in option
> > > >>>> ‘-mcpu=powerpc’
> > > >>>> powerpc-linux-gnuspe-gcc: note: valid arguments to ‘-mcpu=’ are:
> > > >>>> 8540 8548 native
> > > >>>> make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile:231:
> > > >>>> arch/powerpc/boot/crt0.o] Error 1
> > > >>>
> > > >>> corenet64_smp_defconfig :
> > > >>>
> > > >>> BOOTAS arch/powerpc/boot/crt0.o
> > > >>> powerpc64-linux-gcc: error: missing argument to '-mcpu='
> > > >>> make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile:237 : arch/powerpc/boot/crt0.o]
> > > >>> Erreur 1
> > > >>> make: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:253 : uImage] Erreur 2
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> Seems like in fact, E5500_CPU and E6500_CPU are not taken into account
> > > >> in CONFIG_TARGET_CPU, and get special treatment directly in
> > > >> arch/powerpc/Makefile.
> > > >>
> > > >> This goes unnoticed because of CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_TARGET_CPU_BOOL) +=
> > > >> $(call cc-option,-mcpu=$(CONFIG_TARGET_CPU))
> > > >>
> > > >> I think we need to fix that prior to your patch.
> > > >
> > > > It looks like that CONFIG_TARGET_CPU is broken.
> > > >
> > > > $ make ARCH=powerpc corenet64_smp_defconfig CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux-gnu-
> > > > ...
> > > > # configuration written to .config
> > > >
> > > > $ grep CONFIG_TARGET_CPU .config
> > > > CONFIG_TARGET_CPU_BOOL=y
> > > >
> > > > CONFIG_TARGET_CPU_BOOL is set but CONFIG_TARGET_CPU not!
> > >
> > > Yes, because there is no default value for E5500_CPU and E6500_CPU. We
> > > need to add one for each.
> >
> > I see... Will you prepare this fixup for your previous patch?
> >
> > And I think that following construct
> >
> > $(call cc-option,-mcpu=$(CONFIG_TARGET_CPU))
> >
> > should be changed just to
> >
> > -mcpu=$(CONFIG_TARGET_CPU)
> >
> > Because if user specified that want build for specific target CPU, it
> > should not be silently ignored.
>
> Christophe, should I do something in this area?
Christophe, any input from your side?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists