lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 2 Nov 2022 00:06:24 +0100
From:   Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Marek Behún <marek.behun@....cz>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Assign PCI domain by ida_alloc()

On Sunday 09 October 2022 15:39:11 Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 09/10/2022 à 13:29, Pali Rohár a écrit :
> > On Thursday 18 August 2022 11:52:20 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 06:37:56PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 18 August 2022 16:59:33 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 03:50:09PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > > PING?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Pretty much anything sent during the merge window, and just before the
> > > > > merge window gets thrown away. Please rebase onto the current pci tree
> > > > > and repost.
> > > > 
> > > > Please write it pretty clear that you are not interested in those
> > > > patches, and not hiding this info behind asking me after month of
> > > > waiting for another work of rebase with sending them at eight o'clock
> > > > during full moon. It is pretty ridiculous how to say "go away". Thanks.
> > > 
> > > Nobody is saying "go away".  I apologize that I haven't had time to
> > > look at this yet.
> > > 
> > > It's still in patchwork [1], and if it still applies cleanly to
> > > v6.0-rc1, you don't need to do anything.  If it requires rebasing to
> > > apply cleanly, it will expedite things if you do that.
> > > 
> > > Bjorn
> > > 
> > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20220714184130.5436-1-pali@kernel.org/
> > 
> > It applies cleanly on v6.0-rc1.
> > 
> 
> On linux-next, the diff applies, but with offsets on pci.c and pci.h.
> 
> CJ

This should not be an issue. Bjorn?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ