[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2DReuPHZungAGsU@feng-clx>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 15:57:46 +0800
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To: John Thomson <lists@...nthomson.fastmail.com.au>
CC: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kasan-dev@...glegroups.com" <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
<linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] mm/slub: enable debugging memory wasting of
kmalloc
Hi Thomson,
Thanks for testing!
+ mips maintainer and mail list. The original report is here
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/becf2ac3-2a90-4f3a-96d9-a70f67c66e4a@app.fastmail.com/
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 12:18:19AM +0000, John Thomson wrote:
> > As I can't reproduce it locally yet, could you help try 3 tests separately:
> > * change the O2/O3 compile option to O1
> > * try the attached 0001 patch (which cut part of commit)
> > * try attached 0001+0002 patch
>
> None of these changed my outcome.
0001 patch chops off most of the functional changes, and it still
fails. I'm wondering if it is related to the function arguments'
passing, I noticed this is a 32 bits MIPS platform (from your config)
> I also tried compiling the same linux tree & config with the Bootlin toolchain
> (mipsel-buildroot-linux-gnu-gcc.br_real (Buildroot 2021.11-4428-g6b6741b) 12.2.0)
> with the same results.
> I will look into finding or building a mips clang toolchain.
Yes, Hyeonggon's suggestion makes sense, different compiler may
show some difference.
> No JTAG capability to debug, sorry.
>
> I get the same outcome with either the ZBOOT vmlinuz, or vmlinux
>
> Same happening with 6.1-rc3
>
>
> After some blind poking around changing (how much of the commit affected) mm/slub.c,
> I may have got lucky. it appears as though this is all I need to boot:
> (against 6.1-rc3), and with the Bootlin toolchain. Will test my other build system as well.
>
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -3276,7 +3276,7 @@ static void *__slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int node,
> c = slub_get_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
> #endif
>
> - p = ___slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, node, addr, c, orig_size);
> + p = ___slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, node, addr, c, 0);
___slab_alloc()'s argument number has been changed from 5 to 6, and
some others from 4 to 5.
Thanks,
Feng
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT
> slub_put_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
> #endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists