linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v14 2/7] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Fix indentation of the struct epf_ntb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221101115621.GF54667@thinkpad>
Date:   Tue, 1 Nov 2022 17:26:21 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To:     Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Cc:     allenbh@...il.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, dave.jiang@...el.com,
        helgaas@...nel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev, jdmason@...zu.us,
        kw@...ux.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
        ntb@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 2/7] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Fix indentation of
 the struct epf_ntb_ctrl

On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:56:58AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> From: Frank Li <frank.li@....com>
> 
> Indentation of the struct epf_ntb_ctrl align with other struct
> 

"Align the indentation of struct epf_ntb_ctrl with other structs in the driver"

> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <frank.li@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c | 28 +++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> index c0115bcb3b5e..1863006cc36c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
> @@ -99,20 +99,20 @@ enum epf_ntb_bar {
>   *       NTB Driver               NTB Driver
>   */
>  struct epf_ntb_ctrl {
> -	u32     command;
> -	u32     argument;
> -	u16     command_status;
> -	u16     link_status;
> -	u32     topology;
> -	u64     addr;
> -	u64     size;
> -	u32     num_mws;
> -	u32	reserved;
> -	u32     spad_offset;
> -	u32     spad_count;
> -	u32	db_entry_size;
> -	u32     db_data[MAX_DB_COUNT];
> -	u32     db_offset[MAX_DB_COUNT];
> +	u32 command;
> +	u32 argument;
> +	u16 command_status;
> +	u16 link_status;
> +	u32 topology;
> +	u64 addr;
> +	u64 size;
> +	u32 num_mws;
> +	u32 reserved;
> +	u32 spad_offset;
> +	u32 spad_count;
> +	u32 db_entry_size;
> +	u32 db_data[MAX_DB_COUNT];
> +	u32 db_offset[MAX_DB_COUNT];

General question: Don't we need to take care of endianess here?

Thanks,
Mani

>  } __packed;
>  
>  struct epf_ntb {
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்