[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2EcEnAzkt1Qn341@platvala-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 15:16:02 +0200
From: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@...el.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mauro.chehab@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Isabella Basso <isabbasso@...eup.net>, twoerner@...il.com,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, magalilemes00@...il.com,
maira.canal@....br, dlatypov@...gle.com, tales.aparecida@...il.com,
brendanhiggins@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
leandro.ribeiro@...labora.com, igt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, daniel@...ll.ch, n@...aprado.net,
davidgow@...gle.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
andrealmeid@...eup.net, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 4/4] tests: DRM selftests: switch to
KUnit
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 01:54:25PM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 11:18:25 +0300
> Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 09:09:20PM -0300, Isabella Basso wrote:
> > > As the DRM selftests are now using KUnit [1], update IGT tests as well.
> > >
> > > [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220708203052.236290-1-maira.canal@usp.br/
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Isabella Basso <isabbasso@...eup.net>
> > > ---
> > > tests/drm_buddy.c | 7 ++++---
> > > tests/drm_mm.c | 7 ++++---
> > > tests/kms_selftest.c | 12 +++++++++---
> > > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/drm_buddy.c b/tests/drm_buddy.c
> > > index 06876e0c..74c06dce 100644
> > > --- a/tests/drm_buddy.c
> > > +++ b/tests/drm_buddy.c
> > > @@ -6,9 +6,10 @@
> > > #include "igt.h"
> > > #include "igt_kmod.h"
> > >
> > > -IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Basic sanity check of DRM's buddy allocator (struct drm_buddy)");
> > > +IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Basic sanity check of DRM's buddy allocator (struct \
> > > + drm_buddy) using KUnit");
> > >
> > > -igt_main
> > > +igt_simple_main
> > > {
> > > - igt_kselftests("test-drm_buddy", NULL, NULL, NULL);
> > > + igt_kunit("drm_buddy_test", NULL);
> > > }
> >
> > With kselftests we had the ability to only run a specified set of
> > tests, and with or without selection, we had sub-results for each
> > through dynamic subtests. Does kunit have that possibility? I mean I
> > know kunit itself does but what about igt_kunit()?
>
> I don't think so. I created a KUnit with the mock selftests:
>
> $ modinfo test-i915-mock
> filename: /lib/modules/6.1.0-rc2-drm-b1cab854a639+/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/test-i915-mock.ko
> import_ns: I915_SELFTEST
> license: GPL v2
> depends: i915
> retpoline: Y
> intree: Y
> name: test_i915_mock
> vermagic: 6.1.0-rc2-drm-b1cab854a639+ SMP preempt mod_unload
>
> There's no module parameters. Just loading it makes all tests
> there to run.
Ah, the selection is in kunit.ko itself. kunit.filter_glob, set from
kunit.py with
positional arguments:
filter_glob Filter which KUnit test suites/tests run at boot-time, e.g. list* or list*.*del_test
--
Petri Latvala
Powered by blists - more mailing lists