[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2Ewk5i/PAS87fa8@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 16:43:31 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: chenweilong <chenweilong@...wei.com>
Cc: yangyicong@...ilicon.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, wsa@...nel.org,
f.fainelli@...il.com, jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
jdelvare@...e.de, william.zhang@...adcom.com, jsd@...ihalf.com,
conor.dooley@...rochip.com, phil.edworthy@...esas.com,
tharunkumar.pasumarthi@...rochip.com, semen.protsenko@...aro.org,
kfting@...oton.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next v9 1/4] i2c: hisi: Add initial device tree support
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:23:29PM +0800, chenweilong wrote:
> On 2022/10/31 23:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> Thanks very much for your detailed explanation.
You're welcome!
> By the way, is it valuable to make a cleanup for the legacy not-up-to-dated drivers?
>
> There's lots of of_match_ptr or ACPI_PTR...
Not on per se basis, only if there is a series which does something more useful
than that. E.g. enabling PRP0001 trick for discrete component drivers that may
be used on more than a single architecture.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists