[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ED8E1017-A219-4815-BA28-5F44A2FB8FF2@joelfernandes.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 15:51:49 -0400
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] rcu/kfree: Do not request RCU when not needed
> On Nov 2, 2022, at 2:32 PM, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 06:30:24PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
>>>
>>> to wait for a GP. Or if the poll_state_synchronize_rcu(oldstate)) != 0
>>> queue_rcu_work().
>>>
>> A small fix. If poll_state_synchronize_rcu(oldstate)) == 0 then
>> queue_rcu_work() since a GP is still in progress.
>
> Both get_state_synchronize_rcu() and poll_state_synchronize_rcu()
> may be invoked from interrupt handlers. And from NMI handlers,
> for that matter.
Thanks for clarifying. I meant to say cond_synchronize_rcu() cannot be called from interrupt context, but I made that comment before Vlad cooked his patch.
Thanks,
- Joel
> Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists