linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: interconnect: Remove required reg field

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1a7fd1fd-4f0d-bec3-ddd5-7c6a99a2ab01@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 2 Nov 2022 17:11:35 -0400
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc:     Odelu Kukatla <quic_okukatla@...cinc.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: interconnect: Remove required reg
 field

On 31/10/2022 19:29, Melody Olvera wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/27/2022 8:29 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 26/10/2022 15:05, Melody Olvera wrote:
>>> Many of the *-virt compatible devices do not have a reg field
>>> so remove it as required from the bindings.
>> and some virt have it... This should be probably separate binding or if
>> the list is small - allOf:if:then.
> I attempted this; however I'm still seeing failures in dtb_check. I've added this
> to the binding; does this look correct?
>  allOf:
>    - $ref: qcom,rpmh-common.yaml#
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            enum:
> +              - qcom,qdu1000-clk-virt
> +              - qcom,qdu1000-mc-virt
> +
> +    then:
> +      required:
> +        - compatible

No, because we talk about reg, not compatible. You should not require
reg instead for some compatibles... but then the schema is getting
complicated.

It's difficult to give you recommendation because I do not know what are
all these "virt" interconnects. Why some have unit address, why some do not?

Best regards,
Krzysztof