[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7654d9c0-c181-ae6b-96ee-349f20f24b18@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 15:17:41 -0600
From: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>
To: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
CC: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Yuji Ishikawa <yuji2.ishikawa@...hiba.co.jp>,
Jiho Chu <jiho.chu@...sung.com>,
Daniel Stone <daniel@...ishbar.org>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>,
Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com>,
Maciej Kwapulinski <maciej.kwapulinski@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] accel: add dedicated minor for accelerator
devices
On 11/2/2022 2:34 PM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> @@ -24,16 +33,6 @@ static char *accel_devnode(struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
>
> static CLASS_ATTR_STRING(accel_version, 0444, "accel 1.0.0 20221018");
>
> -/**
> - * accel_sysfs_init - initialize sysfs helpers
> - *
> - * This is used to create the ACCEL class, which is the implicit parent of any
> - * other top-level ACCEL sysfs objects.
> - *
> - * You must call accel_sysfs_destroy() to release the allocated resources.
> - *
> - * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure.
> - */
Why are we removing this?
> static int accel_sysfs_init(void)
> {
> int err;
> @@ -54,11 +53,6 @@ static int accel_sysfs_init(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * accel_sysfs_destroy - destroys ACCEL class
> - *
> - * Destroy the ACCEL device class.
> - */
Again, why remove this? Adding it in one patch than immediately
removing it in the next patch seems wasteful.
> static void accel_sysfs_destroy(void)
> {
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(accel_class))
> @@ -68,11 +62,185 @@ static void accel_sysfs_destroy(void)
> accel_class = NULL;
> }
>
> +static void accel_minor_release(struct drm_minor *minor)
> +{
> + drm_dev_put(minor->dev);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * accel_open - open method for ACCEL file
> + * @inode: device inode
> + * @filp: file pointer.
> + *
> + * This function must be used by drivers as their &file_operations.open method.
Feels like it would be helpful to have an accel version of
DEFINE_DRM_GEM_FOPS() which helps accel drivers to get this right
> + * It looks up the correct ACCEL device and instantiates all the per-file
> + * resources for it. It also calls the &drm_driver.open driver callback.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success or negative errno value on failure.
> + */
> +int accel_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev;
> + struct drm_minor *minor;
> + int retcode;
> +
> + minor = accel_minor_acquire(iminor(inode));
> + if (IS_ERR(minor))
> + return PTR_ERR(minor);
> +
> + dev = minor->dev;
> +
> + atomic_fetch_inc(&dev->open_count);
> +
> + /* share address_space across all char-devs of a single device */
> + filp->f_mapping = dev->anon_inode->i_mapping;
> +
> + retcode = drm_open_helper(filp, minor);
> + if (retcode)
> + goto err_undo;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_undo:
> + atomic_dec(&dev->open_count);
> + accel_minor_release(minor);
> + return retcode;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(accel_open);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists