linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/14] x86/microcode/intel: Expose find_matching

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Nov 2022 14:32:10 -0700
From:   "Joseph, Jithu" <jithu.joseph@...el.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     <hdegoede@...hat.com>, <markgross@...nel.org>,
        <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
        <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
        <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        <tony.luck@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, <patches@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>, <thiago.macieira@...el.com>,
        <athenas.jimenez.gonzalez@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] x86/microcode/intel: Expose
 find_matching_signature() for IFS



On 11/2/2022 12:03 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 01:34:04PM -0700, Jithu Joseph wrote:
>> IFS uses 'scan test images' provided by Intel that can be regarded as
>> firmware. IFS test image carries microcode header with extended signature
>> table.
>>
>> Expose find_matching_signature() for verifying if the test image
>> header or the extended signature table indicate whether an IFS test image
>> is fit to run on a system. Add microcode_intel_ prefix to the
>> function name.
> 
> This doesn't look like the right design to me:
> 
> If this is going to be generic CPU-vendor related code which other
> facilities like the microcode loader can use, then the prefix should be
> intel_<bla>. Just like intel_cpu_signatures_match().
> 
> Then that code should either be in a lib-like compilation unit or simply
> in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c. Just like intel_cpu_signatures_match().

Will rename the function to intel_find_matching_signature() and move it to
to arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c as you suggest above and add its declaration
to arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h (where intel_cpu_signatures_match() is defined)

Jithu