[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221102232958.3f5eaa53@thinkpad>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 23:29:58 +0100
From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mm: delay rmap removal until after TLB flush
On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 10:55:10 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 2:15 AM Christian Borntraeger
> <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > It certainly needs a build fix for s390:
> >
> > In file included from kernel/sched/core.c:78:
> > ./arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h: In function '__tlb_remove_page_size':
> > ./arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h:50:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'page_zap_pte_rmap' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 50 | page_zap_pte_rmap(page);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Hmm. I'm not sure if I can add a
>
> #include <linux/rmap.h>
>
> to that s390 asm header file without causing more issues.
>
> The minimal damage would probably be to duplicate the declaration of
> page_zap_pte_rmap() in the s390 asm/tlb.h header where it is used.
>
> Not pretty to have two different declarations of that thing, but
> anything that then includes both <asm/tlb.h> and <linux/rmap.h> (which
> is much of mm) would then verify the consistency of them.
>
> So I'll do that minimal fix and update that branch, but if s390 people
> end up having a better fix, please holler.
It compiles now with your duplicate declaration, but adding the #include
also did not cause any damage, so that should also be OK.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists