linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: process: Describe kernel version prefix for third option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b1914779-0303-3d37-a504-e1715f7ee0af@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Nov 2022 11:19:44 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: process: Describe kernel version prefix
 for third option

On 11/1/22 20:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 
> No, sorry, this is not needed and does not have to be in the subject
> line at all.
> 
> The current wording is fine, it's just that people don't always read it.
> 
> so consider this a NAK.
> 

Hi Greg,

There was a case when a submitter submitted multiple backports (which
qualified for third option) without specifying the prefix, hence a
reviewer complained [1].

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221101074351.GA8310@amd/

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara