linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/30] scsi: target: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2326193c-d522-afa3-2e68-c88bf2a6483f@nvidia.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Nov 2022 05:54:20 +0000
From:   Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "target-devel@...r.kernel.org" <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/30] scsi: target: Use kstrtobool() instead of
 strtobool()

On 11/1/22 14:13, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> strtobool() is the same as kstrtobool().
> However, the latter is more used within the kernel.
> 
> In order to remove strtobool() and slightly simplify kstrtox.h, switch to
> the other function name.
> 
> While at it, include the corresponding header file (<linux/kstrtox.h>)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> This patch is part of a serie that axes all usages of strtobool().
> Each patch can be applied independently from the other ones.
> 
> The last patch of the serie removes the definition of strtobool().
> 
> You may not be in copy of the cover letter. So, if needed, it is available
> at [1].
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1667336095.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr/
> ---
>   drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c        | 29 ++++++++++----------
>   drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c |  3 +-
>   2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c b/drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c
> index 533524299ed6..b8a5c8d6cfde 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>    *
>    ****************************************************************************/
>   



I believe you have tested this patch thoroughly, with that,

Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>

-ck