linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/boot: robustify calling startup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6b8d8331-bf1c-eaf7-83c0-bb258e3f2e23@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 2 Nov 2022 07:14:00 +0100
From:   Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To:     Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/boot: robustify calling startup_{32,64}() from
 the decompressor code

On 01. 11. 22, 17:15, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> After commit ce697ccee1a8 ("kbuild: remove head-y syntax"), I
> started digging whether x86 is ready for removing this old cruft.
> Removing its objects from the list makes the kernel unbootable.
> This applies only to bzImage, vmlinux still works correctly.
> The reason is that with no strict object order determined by the
> linker arguments, not the linker script, startup_64 can be placed
> not right at the beginning of the kernel.
> Here's vmlinux.map's beginning before removing:
> 
> ffffffff81000000         vmlinux.o:(.head.text)
> ffffffff81000000                 startup_64
> ffffffff81000070                 secondary_startup_64
> ffffffff81000075                 secondary_startup_64_no_verify
> ffffffff81000160                 verify_cpu
> 
> and after:
> 
> ffffffff81000000         vmlinux.o:(.head.text)
> ffffffff81000000                 pvh_start_xen
> ffffffff81000080                 startup_64
> ffffffff810000f0                 secondary_startup_64
> ffffffff810000f5                 secondary_startup_64_no_verify
> 
> Not a problem itself, but the self-extractor code has the address of
> that function hardcoded the beginning, not looking onto the ELF
> header, which always contains the address of startup_{32,64}().
> 
> So, instead of doing an "act of blind faith", just take the address
> from the ELF header and extract a relative offset to the entry
> point. The decompressor function already returns a pointer to the
> beginning of the kernel to the Asm code, which then jumps to it,
> so add that offset to the return value.
> This doesn't change anything for now, but allows to resign from the
> "head object list" for x86 and makes sure valid Kbuild or any other
> improvements won't break anything here in general.
> 
> Tested-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>

Reviewed-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs