linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] RISC-V: stop selecting device drivers in Kconfig.socs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y2IXrD4FpXNmDDPk@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Nov 2022 08:09:32 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] RISC-V: stop selecting device drivers in Kconfig.socs

On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 12:02:09PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 06:13:43PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > 
> > As my RFC [0] series doing the symbol name changes has not yet reached
> > consensus, I've split out the removal of device driver selects into a
> > new series. I kept the plic as a direct select - although given how Maz
> > is treating the SiFive plic driver as the RISC-V plic driver, maybe that
> > should just be selected by default at an arch level...
> > 
> > I assume the individual patches can go via their subsystems & I'll
> > resubmit the arch/riscv patches a cycle later? I'm not in any rush.
> 
> Hey,
> 
> What's the story here with the two serial patches, they just waiting for
> an Ack? I think these are archived on the riscv patchwork, so if that is
> the case I'll unarchive them and mark as needing one.

Sorry for the delay, I'll take both of them through the tty/serial tree.

thanks,

greg k-h