linux-kernel - [PATCH -next,v2] bpf, test_run: fix alignment problem in bpf_prog_test_run

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221102081620.1465154-1-zhongbaisong@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Nov 2022 16:16:20 +0800
From:   Baisong Zhong <zhongbaisong@...wei.com>
To:     <edumazet@...gle.com>, <keescook@...omium.org>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        <glider@...gle.com>, <elver@...gle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <zhongbaisong@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next,v2] bpf, test_run: fix alignment problem in bpf_prog_test_run_skb()

we got a syzkaller problem because of aarch64 alignment fault
if KFENCE enabled.

When the size from user bpf program is an odd number, like
399, 407, etc, it will cause the struct skb_shared_info's
unaligned access. As seen below:

BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free read in __skb_clone+0x23c/0x2a0 net/core/skbuff.c:1032

Use-after-free read at 0xffff6254fffac077 (in kfence-#213):
 __lse_atomic_add arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:26 [inline]
 arch_atomic_add arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h:28 [inline]
 arch_atomic_inc include/linux/atomic-arch-fallback.h:270 [inline]
 atomic_inc include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:241 [inline]
 __skb_clone+0x23c/0x2a0 net/core/skbuff.c:1032
 skb_clone+0xf4/0x214 net/core/skbuff.c:1481
 ____bpf_clone_redirect net/core/filter.c:2433 [inline]
 bpf_clone_redirect+0x78/0x1c0 net/core/filter.c:2420
 bpf_prog_d3839dd9068ceb51+0x80/0x330
 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:728 [inline]
 bpf_test_run+0x3c0/0x6c0 net/bpf/test_run.c:53
 bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x638/0xa7c net/bpf/test_run.c:594
 bpf_prog_test_run kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3148 [inline]
 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4441 [inline]
 __se_sys_bpf+0xad0/0x1634 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4381

kfence-#213: 0xffff6254fffac000-0xffff6254fffac196, size=407, cache=kmalloc-512

allocated by task 15074 on cpu 0 at 1342.585390s:
 kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:568 [inline]
 kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:675 [inline]
 bpf_test_init.isra.0+0xac/0x290 net/bpf/test_run.c:191
 bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x11c/0xa7c net/bpf/test_run.c:512
 bpf_prog_test_run kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3148 [inline]
 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4441 [inline]
 __se_sys_bpf+0xad0/0x1634 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4381
 __arm64_sys_bpf+0x50/0x60 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4381

To fix the problem, we adjust @size so that (@size + @hearoom) is a
multiple of SMP_CACHE_BYTES. So we make sure the struct skb_shared_info
is aligned to a cache line.

Fixes: 1cf1cae963c2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command")
Signed-off-by: Baisong Zhong <zhongbaisong@...wei.com>
---
v2: use SKB_DATA_ALIGN instead kmalloc_size_roundup
---
 net/bpf/test_run.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 4b855af267b1..bfdd7484b93f 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -259,6 +259,7 @@ static void *bpf_test_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 size,
 	if (user_size > size)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EMSGSIZE);
 
+	size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
 	data = kzalloc(size + headroom + tailroom, GFP_USER);
 	if (!data)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-- 
2.25.1